Evidence is the engine of decision-making
Choice is informed by evidence. Decision is determined by data. Presenting the evidence from research is key to our work with farmers and advisors around the world. The results from the research work we have supported in Brazil is a good example of how to contribute to better understanding of crop nutrition and best fertilizer practice.
From the pot up
Any farmer faced with a choice of fertilizer is going to need proof of how a new alternative compares with an existing option. For some that may involve trials on their own land, or visiting trial plots. However others are reassured by the science of the micro-plot or pot.
In Brazil, at Sao Paulo University, in research carried out with the support of
IPI and ICL, the rice crop was taken back to the pot. A low nutrient sandy soil was planted with rice and polyhalite performance was compared with alternative potash fertilizers. Polyhalite, marketed as Polysulphate, performed very well.
Rice plants lacking the macronutrients K, S, Ca, and Mg displayed very poor development (see photo below). Soluble sources of these nutrients and granular or powder polyhalite application, enabled normal plant development.
Both granular and powder polyhalite displayed a similar effectiveness in supplying plants with K, S, Ca, and Mg, when compared to soluble sources. No toxicity or salinity problems occurred following normal or doubled polyhalite application.
These results, collated under greenhouse conditions, demonstrate the principal effectiveness of Polysulphate as a fertilizer, even on low fertility soils.